3,100 Reasons to Oppose a New Town in Hart

Hart becomes Housing Sink for Surrey Heath and Rushmor

Hart becomes sink for 3,100 houses from Surrey Heath and Rushmoor

A new town in Hart District, whether in Winchfield or anywhere else, will open up Hart to be a sink for 3,100 overflow houses from Surrey Heath and Rushmoor Borough Councils. Yet Hart District Council’s strategy for the Local Plan has set us on the path for a new town which makes this inevitable and will destroy our green fields and wildlife habitats and clog up all of our infrastructure.

If you disagree with this strategy please sign the We Love Hart (We ♥ Hart) petition.

The Strategic Housing Market Assessment (SHMA), calls for Hart to build a total of around 7,500 houses in the district up to 2031.  Our neighbouring districts, Surrey Heath and Rushmoor also have demanding targets and are saying that they cannot build all of their own allocation in their districts.  So, they want to pass over an extra 3,100 or so houses (1,700 from Rushmoor and 1,400 from Surrey Heath) to Hart that will push our target up to around 10,600 houses.  See answers to questions here, page 17.

In their housing options paper the council says that we would need to deliver 1,800-2,400 houses on a new settlement (Option 4). However, the Barratts New Town proposal document says that such a new settlement would have capacity for 5,000 houses, more than twice the size of Elvetham Heath,  and could start building as early as 2017.  This leaves a convenient surplus  of around 3,000 dwellings in the new settlement that could be used to fill the shortfall  from Surrey Heath and Rushmoor.

The We Heart Hart campaign believes this is a grave strategic error on the part of Hart Council because they are following a policy that means there is a real risk we will have to build even more houses in Hart and concrete over our green fields.

The impact of this could be enormous:

  • Massive increase in congestion throughout all of the district.
  • Increased stress on already creaking infrastructure
  • Overcrowding of trains already running over capacity
  • Massive environmental harm to the SSSI’s, SINCs and the Thames Valley Heath SPA
  • Coalescence of Fleet, Church Crookham, Crookham Village, Dogmersfield, Winchfield, Hartley Wintney, North Warnborough and Odiham into a giant conurbation.
Posted in Congestion, Environment & Ecology, Hampshire, Hart District Council, Hart Local Plan, Hart SHMA, Infrastructure Costs, Risk of becoming sink for Surrey Heath and Rushmoor, We ♥ Hart Campaign, We Heart Hart Campaign, We Love Hart Campaign and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .


  1. Pingback: The case for a brownfield solution to Hart District's housing needs

  2. Pingback: What’s changed since 2012? | We Heart Hart

  3. Pingback: Housing allocation for Hart, Rushmoor and Surrey Heath should reduce by 6,560 according to new DCLG figures | We Heart Hart

  4. Pingback: Hart District Council rejects key elements of the We Heart Hart petition

  5. Pingback: How Hart Council should respond to the We Heart Hart petition | We Heart Hart

  6. Pingback: Is Hart District Council Pushing Through the Local Plan without proper consultation? | We Heart Hart

  7. Pingback: We Heart Hart Petition submitted to Hart District Council | We Heart Hart

  8. Pingback: Support for urban development bigger than for a new town at Winchfield | We Heart Hart

  9. Pingback: Rushmoor protecting acres of vacant offices and asking Hart to build 1,600 houses for them | We Heart Hart

  10. Pingback: Please help Hart fend off an extra 1,600 houses from Rushmoor | We Heart Hart

  11. Pingback: Hart Council rolls over and starts to plan for an extra 1,600 houses from Rushmoor Borough Council

  12. Pingback: We Heart Hart Petition to campaign against concreting over the green fields of Hart District breaks 2,000 barrier

  13. Pingback: Hart District is being asked to build too many houses for its Local Plan

  14. Pingback: The brownfield development tracker for Hart District Local Plan in Hampshire

  15. Pingback: How to make a better Local Plan for Hart District | We Heart Hart

  16. Pingback: We Heart Hart petition breaks the 1,500 barrier | We Heart Hart

  17. Pingback: Hart District Council and Government Inspector ride roughshod over local democracy | We Heart Hart

  18. Pingback: We Heart Hart petition is now twice as big as Hart District Council consultation | We Heart Hart

  19. Pingback: Where does your Hart District Council candidate stand on a new town? | We Heart Hart

  20. Pingback: Hart District Council gets its facts wrong on the Local Plan | We Heart Hart

  21. Pingback: Official: Hart has no Vision | We Heart Hart

  22. Pingback: We Heart Hart Questions for Hart Council | We Heart Hart

Comments are closed.