Our local MP, Ranil Jayawardena has published an article on his website showing his support for the redevelopment of the brownfield Hartland Park (formerly the Pyestock, National Gas Turbine Establishment (NGTE) site, near Fleet in Hart District, Hampshire. Readers will remember, that it is proposed to build 1,500 new homes on this site.
He is pictured with the Secretary of State for Defence, Michael Fallon and leader of Hart District Council, Stephen Parker.
Ranil Jayawardena, M.P., said: “Pyestock is exactly the sort of brownfield regeneration that should be supported. I am pleased that Hart are working together with HM Government to deliver homes on brownfield sites wherever possible, rather than building on green fields.”
Secretary of State, Michael Fallon, M.P., said: “It’s good to see sites like Pyestock being put forward for development. HM Government is ensuring that brownfield regeneration is central to local areas building new homes. A new ‘brownfield register’ is included in the Housing and Planning Bill, which will ensure that development is prioritised on brownfield sites rather than at the expense of the countryside.
We Heart Hart warmly welcomes Ranil’s support for this project. We understand that a site for Suitable Alternative Natural Greenspace (SANG), needs to be found before the redevelopment can go ahead. Let us hope that Michael Fallon can help find some redundant MoD land to help with this, so it can be included in the Hart Local Plan.
Simon Laws I am sure the answer to that question is ‘Yes’. Indeed the whole idea about getting some Government support for land remediation is so that the developer then has more cash to fund local infrastructure.
But of course, we can’t be certain until there is a definite proposal on the table. We need to scrutinise that when it comes, and make representations accordingly.
Simon Laws I am sure the answer to that question is ‘Yes’. Indeed the whole idea about getting some Government support for land remediation is so that the developer then has more cash to fund local infrastructure.
But of course, we can’t be certain until there is a definite proposal on the table. We need to scrutinise that when it comes, and make representations accordingly.
Will they (council or developer) consider the need for the extra health, social care and education provision in the area when building these new houses?
Will they (council or developer) consider the need for the extra health, social care and education provision in the area when building these new houses?
On first name terms with our MP, are we?
On first name terms with our MP, are we?