UPDATE: See details of new SWR timetable consultation here
[Post updated to correct interpretation of confusing timetable]
Summary of Winchfield Hook train cuts
South Western Railways (SWR) has launched a consultation that proposes Winchfield and Hook train timetable cuts. The full document can be found here. The proposals:
- Reduce the number of peak morning services to London from eight to five
- Increase peak time services from Fleet, but there is no extra car-parking to cope with additional passengers
Please use the download below to respond to consultation.
Please also sign Ranil’s petition which can be found here.
Impact of Winchfield Hook train cuts
The current line to London is already running beyond capacity, and these changes represent a reduction in service at peak hours which cannot be a good idea. The impact of the cuts will be to:
- Three peak-time services from Winchfield and Hook to London cut from the timetable
- Harder for commuters to get to work and for children to get to school/college
- Increased pressure on already over-crowded Fleet station
- More road congestion and increased carbon footprint
Of course, we all know many thousands more houses are planned for the area, so it cannot make sense to reduce capacity just as demand is about to increase.
This goes against the commitments SWR made when bidding for the contract:
As part of our bid we promised new and better trains, more seats, improved service frequencies and quicker journey times.
Their proposals also go against the objectives they set in the consultation:
The new timetable has been designed to deliver more services, more peak capacity and seats, allow the introduction of new suburban rolling stock (starting later in 2019) and increase frequencies on some routes. Most suburban routes have earlier services than now and many routes have later evening trains.
SWR seem to recognise there might be significant issues with their proposed changes to Winchfield and Hook train services. We do think they ought to make ‘some adjustments’ to their proposals.
How to respond to the consultation
The consultation is open until Friday 22nd December 2017. Comments can be sent to [email protected]. We have produced a download with some suggested comments to be made to SWR. This can be found below:
Our main alternative suggestions are:
- Keep the frequency of peak time services to London.
- Increase capacity by running more 12-car trains.
- Reduce the number of first class carriages on 8 and 12-car trains to further increase passenger capacity.
Winchfield-Hook train cuts analysis
The current morning timetable is shown below:
This shows eight trains during the peak morning hours between 6:30 and 8:30 and all of these services are direct to London.
The proposed timetable is shown below:
This has only six morning peak services. Note also that half of the off-peak services now require passengers to change at Woking
There are also changes to evening services. The current evening timetable is shown below:
This shows eight services in the peak hours 5 and 7pm. All of these services are direct.
The proposed timetable is shown below:
The proposed timetable shows eight services in the peak hours from 5pm to 7pm and these are all direct. This isn’t a significant change.
Pingback: Ranil petition to fight #SWRCuts to Winchfield and Hook trains | We Heart Hart
Please also respond saying Fleet needs an extra fast train per hour to/from London (ie one every 20 minutes), as well as pointing out that Hook & Winchfield services shouldn’t be reduced as that would have a detrimental effect on traffic in Fleet.
Steve, I have a look at the proposed timetable, and as far as I can tell, Fleet gets 3 more peak services and gets 4 services per hour at off-peak times. Although, given the confusing nature of the proposed timetable, I am not quite ready to publish it.
On the face of it, that might be a good thing to increase frequency, but the cuts elsewhere are likely to lead to even more people wanting to use what is already a crowded station, leading to more road congestion and increased carbon footprint.
What do you think Fleet’s residents would think of the proposals overall?
Fleet’s residents I suspect will be happy if you’re right but will respect that worse services at Hook and Winchfield will be detrimental. Maybe you can’t have both Fleet improved, without losing some other services, due to limitations on train numbers and track usage.